A New Era of Culture-Based Conflict
As the Cold War ended, it became clear that traditional power struggles were evolving. Modern turmoil is no longer a simple battle between nations or ideologies; instead, the world is shifting toward deeper conflicts rooted in faith and ancient identities. In the early 1990s, a strange sight appeared in a Moscow government building: the new flag of the Russian Federation was proudly displayed, but it was hanging upside down. This minor error captured a much larger truth about a world in transition, where people everywhere began searching for new identities by reaching back to ancient symbols, religions, and heritages.
The global landscape has shifted from a battle of political ideologies to a friction between cultures. In Sarajevo, protesters began waving the flags of Saudi Arabia and Turkey rather than those of the UN or NATO, signaling that their deepest loyalties lay with their fellow Muslims. In Los Angeles, thousands marched under Mexican flags to protest local legislation. These displays show that in the modern world, cultural identity is what matters most to people. We are entering an era that is both multipolar and multicivilizational. For centuries, international politics was essentially a series of disputes within Western civilization, which then expanded to dominate the globe. Today, the world is divided into seven or eight major civilizations, each with its own distinct values.
The most basic question humans face is "Who are we?" and the answer is increasingly found in ancestry, religion, and language. We define ourselves not just by what we believe, but by whom we are against. While nation-states remain the primary actors on the world stage, their behavior is now shaped by cultural preferences. They are more likely to trust those who share their heritage and fear those who do not. To navigate this new reality, we must move past the illusion of a single, harmonious world. The idea that the end of the Cold War meant the "end of history" or the universal triumph of Western democracy was a short-lived dream. Instead of harmony, we see a multiplication of ethnic conflicts and the resurgence of religious fundamentalism.
Other ways of mapping the world, such as dividing it into "rich and poor" or as a collection of 184 states acting only on power, also fall short. States do not just seek power; they seek to protect their way of life alongside those who share it. The most dangerous conflicts now occur along the "fault lines" where different civilizations meet. These are not just local squabbles; they have the potential to escalate as "kin countries" rush to support their cultural cousins. We saw this in the former Yugoslavia, where Russia supported the Serbs and Muslim nations supported the Bosnians, driven by a sense of shared identity. This cultural lens allows us to predict tensions that other models miss. For instance, a purely political view might worry about a war between Russia and Ukraine. A civilizational view, however, sees their deep cultural links but warns of a different danger: a split within Ukraine itself, which is divided by a historical line separating its Western-leaning regions from its Orthodox eastern half.
The West remains the most powerful civilization for now, but its relative influence is declining. To avoid a global catastrophe, Western leaders must stop trying to impose their values as universal truths. True stability comes from moving past simplistic "us versus them" mentalities and building coalitions based on mutual respect and restraint. Recognizing these deep-seated differences is the only way to manage international relations in a crowded world.
Full summary available in the Readsome app
