How News Serves Power

The news is often presented as an independent check on power, but its basic structure pushes it in another direction. Large media organizations are businesses, and they operate inside a political and economic system dominated by wealthy institutions, major corporations, and the state. Because of that setting, the news does not usually need direct censorship to support established power. The pressures are built into the system long before any story reaches the public.

This influence works in quiet ways. Editors, reporters, and executives learn what counts as serious news, which sources are respectable, and which opinions sound responsible. Most of them do not think of themselves as serving propaganda, and many act with sincerity. Yet the range of accepted debate is still narrow, and it usually stays close to the interests of governments, corporations, and allied elites.

That pattern becomes especially clear when the same event is judged differently depending on who caused the harm. Violence by enemy states is treated as proof of deep evil and receives emotional, detailed coverage. Violence by the United States or by governments it supports is softened, buried, or stripped of human detail. The result is not simply bias in isolated stories, but a moral map that directs public anger toward official enemies and away from allied crimes.

The same logic appears at home as well as abroad. When both major parties and major business interests agree on an issue, coverage tends to shrink into technical arguments rather than basic moral or political questions. Public opposition to trade deals, military spending, or corporate deregulation can be pushed to the margins, while protest movements are reduced to images of disorder, clothing, or street clashes. Important grievances remain in the background, and the audience is encouraged to watch politics as spectators rather than take part in it.

The system has changed in form over time, but not in its basic direction. Media ownership has become more concentrated, with giant firms linking news to entertainment and wider corporate interests. New technologies created hopes for a more open public sphere, and they have allowed some independent voices to reach people directly. Still, the most visible spaces are often dominated by the same large brands, and the older patterns of access, promotion, and credibility remain powerful.

Full summary available in the Readsome app

About the authors

Edward S. Herman

Edward S. Herman was an American economist, media scholar, and social critic who became a professor emeritus of finance at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Specializing in corporate and regulatory issues, political economy, and media analysis, he was a prominent critic of corporate influence and media propaganda, particularly concerning U.S. foreign policy. Together with his frequent co-author Noam Chomsky, Herman developed the "propaganda model" of media criticism, a theory that examines how systemic filters and biases in mass media shape public consent for elite interests.

Noam Chomsky

Avram Noam Chomsky is an American linguist, philosopher, and political activist often called "the father of modern linguistics." His work, which began to gain prominence in the 1950s, revolutionized the field by proposing that the ability to learn language is innate to humans. In addition to his groundbreaking linguistic theories, Chomsky is a prolific author and prominent public intellectual known for his critiques of U.S. foreign policy, capitalism, and the mass media.